By beating it, and the beast/root of evil, he sees that he is not evil (which many ending are about, Isaac blaming himself for his parents breaking up etc.). Just because you do not think that and choose to look only at the surface of that ending, does not mean that no one would interpret it the intended way themselves.īefore the ending Isaac fights against dogma, which is the root of his mother's (religious) abuse against Isaac. Without edmunds tweet not a single person on the planet thought the final ending was isaac dying. What kind of father would tell their child this kind of bedtime story? Also if Isaac's parents hadn't broken up, why would Isaac blame himself for them breaking up in some kind of story? Yeah I don't know where to take this from here but hope someone enjoyed reading that. If this is the case, why is it so unreasonable of him to depict his own mother as an evil monster that needs to be slain? Through Isaac's perspective, maybe she is. His home life and his study of the bible become mirror-images of one another, with reality reflected in its pages, and the content of its pages reflected in reality. In his misery, Isaac imagines random junk from around his house - the only possessions he knows - becoming the tools of his empowerment and eventual liberation. I think TBoI is about how the real things that happen to children during their early development can have an almost immeasurable effect on their imagined world, and their wider perspective. In the conclusion, Isaac's dad, whether atheist or simply less-religious, sees this programming in effect, and the despair it inspires in him, and is working to steer him towards the possibility that a story can have a happy ending - something that he can't even fathom because of his life thus far. The story he is sharing with his father (however coherent it is in reality) is, in his own mind, inspired to the same capacity as the thought leaders who act as his role models. While fighting Dogma, you can hear the sort of fervent, inspired rhetoric that he's exposed to. Isaac's head must be positively stuffed with judeo-christian mythology that colours everything in his life. Then consider the whole symbolism of the TV. If you were a child reading a story, isn't there a chance you'd naturally project yourself onto a character with whom you share your own age, gender, and name? His story of his mother hunting him down with a knife perfectly parallels the story of Isaac present in the bible. The repeated imagery throughout the game's various endings of Isaac dying horribly could be a projection of the grotesque, death-laden content present in the bible (especially the Old Testament). In his mind, Isaac is "fighting" his mother, when in reality, he's just drawing a picture of her and imagining doing so. The ending after fighting "mother" supports this. The game is framed through the perspective of a child, so it's not completely unreasonable to interpret that the whole knife altercation is an imagined manifestation of Isaac's worries, rather than a literal event that takes place. Incoherent ramble incoming.Ĭonsider that Isaac was somehow able to be removed from the abusive situation presented by his mother and returned into his father's custody. I think there's a possibility that the secret ending could be the "real" canon.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |